🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.